gfxgfx
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
gfx gfx
gfxgfx
 
September 18: Tucson/Marana Meet
September 25: Fix a Sol Day - North Glendale - 51st ave and 101 area
October 9-10: 13th Anniversary Drive Click here
---------------------------------------------------------------------
AzSols is now on Facebook Check us out! Mike (Lil Blue)

View all 2010 events - Click here Mike (Lil Blue)

Azsols Photo Gallery - Click here Mike (Lil Blue)
 
gfx gfx
gfx
16281 Posts in 1512 Topics by 112 Members - Latest Member: RPG2ach September 08, 2010, 11:06:45 AM
*
gfx*HomeHelpSearchLoginRegistergfx
gfxgfx
      « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Az traffic cameras  (Read 277 times)
Flipper
Senior Mechanic
****
Posts: 618


"confidently potty trained"


Az traffic cameras
« on: January 28, 2010, 09:57:54 PM »

 An automated enforcement company is turning to an unelected branch of government to re-write Arizona law regarding proper service for traffic tickets. Redflex Traffic Systems of Melbourne, Australia asked the Arizona Supreme Court to modify the state’s rules of civil procedure to better accommodate red light cameras and speed cameras. the petition prepared by Redflex lawyers stated. “Rule 4.1 does not currently allow defendants in photo enforcement proceedings to be validly served with a copy of the summons and pleading by first-class mail.”Under Arizona law, photo citations issued by municipalities carry license points. Although private vendors may send citations through regular mail, motorists are under no obligation to send payment unless they receive personal service.According to  state documents, motorists have outright rejected automated citations paying them just 26.8 percent of the time. The resulting impact on Redflex finances has been so severe that investors threw out the company's chairman for getting involved in the freeway ticketing venture . Opponents of photo radar reject the idea that the state should bail a foreign company out of its difficulties.Arizona Citizens Against Photo Radar representative Shawn Dow told TheNewspaper. “Why would the supreme court overturn 200 years of proper service because a private foreign company wants it? Australian companies shouldn’t be re-writing U.S. law.”

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/traffic-camera-company-seeks-to-rewrite-arizona-law/
Logged

Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae So palese dnot copmilan aoubt my tpynig you konw you can raed it



Lil Blue
President
Admin
Master Mechanic
*********
Posts: 1627


How low is your Sol?


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2010, 06:41:43 PM »

they just need to take them down, most people just slow down for them then speed back up after. Waste of time and money.
Logged

"You know what? This will desimate all..... after..... you put about 15 grand in it... or more, if we have to..... overnight parts from Ja-pan" -Jesse
ImmortaL
NH-503p
Moderator
Master Mechanic
******
Posts: 2998


Sippin' That Haterade


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2010, 09:00:58 AM »

They're probably gonna have to decriminalize marijuana just to dig out of the hole these caused in the budget Tongue
Logged


HPK - Hardparked for life.
mhopkins10
Grease Monkey
**
Posts: 113


RED SOL


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2010, 10:14:35 AM »

I just got hit by one of these cameras last night on the US 60 it got me at about 86 mph which i think the speed limit is 65 on there which sucks damn camera's.
Logged
Aodhan
Spectator
*
Posts: 1


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2010, 08:38:56 AM »

Yeah, it's the camera's fault that you were doing 21+ over the speed limit.

On a related note, the newest generation of cameras can now also monitor cars for cell phone activity.

John
Logged
ImmortaL
NH-503p
Moderator
Master Mechanic
******
Posts: 2998


Sippin' That Haterade


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2010, 09:22:02 AM »

Yeah, it's the camera's fault that you were doing 21+ over the speed limit.

On a related note, the newest generation of cameras can now also monitor cars for cell phone activity.

John
and thats where these cross the line.
Logged


HPK - Hardparked for life.
mhopkins10
Grease Monkey
**
Posts: 113


RED SOL


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2010, 10:29:02 AM »

it is not the camera's fualt but i think that if i am going to get a speeding tickect then there should be a cop who gives it to me. Why do they not have to work for there money and i do i have no problem with tickects as i have quite a few of them on my record but they should be out there trying to catch people not sitting behind a desk sending out tickects that is what get me and for the cell phone thank god for bluetooth lol
Logged
daavssol
Gopher
*
Posts: 45


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2010, 10:23:54 PM »

They have to serve you within 120 days of the offense...just dont answer your door for a while....lol
Logged
JonnyB
Grease Monkey
**
Posts: 196



WWW
Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2010, 09:53:26 AM »

i just keep goin... put your middle finger infront of your face. makes for a good picture. and NO ticket.
Logged

ImmortaL
NH-503p
Moderator
Master Mechanic
******
Posts: 2998


Sippin' That Haterade


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2010, 10:27:55 AM »

or you could just not drive like retards in front of the cameras. Works out pretty well for me since I got my red light ticket a while back Tongue
Logged


HPK - Hardparked for life.
mhopkins10
Grease Monkey
**
Posts: 113


RED SOL


Re: Az traffic cameras
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2010, 11:47:06 PM »

So far i havent gotten the tickect in the mail thank god lol maybe it was to dark for them to get a clear picture
Logged
gfx
Pages: [1] Print 
gfx
Jump to:  
gfx gfx
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!